Franklin BioScience recently conducted multiple controlled experiments to determine what lighting solution they would use in their new Las Vegas, NV cannabis cultivation facility. Fluence outperformed the incumbent 1000W DE HPS as well as other LED solutions.
Results to-date include 85 grams-per-square-foot of canopy, 2.1 grams-per-watt and increased potency across multiple genetics over historical HPS averages.
Their new vertical farm deploys Fluence SPYDRx PLUS on the bottom layer and Fluence VYPRx PLUS on the top layer of rolling-rack systems from Greenhaus Industries in flower, and Fluence SPYDRx PLUS and Fluence RAZRx in vegetative.
Video Rating: / 5
What kind of vertical racks are you using?
What strain is ?
Hence, the answer to all the HID zealots who always say in YT comments.."If Led was any good then why dont commercial grows use led?"…….
Sorry HID fanatics but this is the future.
2.1 gm p/watt that is top notch..!
Hello, would you please share what is the average of (μmol m-2 s-1) & FAR W/m-2 on 1m2 say from 40cm of the light source?I am really interesting.I have seen some videos from you where you measuring just the hots spot but I like to see the average 😉 as really looking to buy some of your lights.. Many thanks!
Hi, Do you have any idea of what types of flood tables those are in the pallet racking? Those are great, but I can't seem to find them anywhere. Thanks!!
How many plants are they cultivating in a 4×8 ft bay when flowering?
very cool
85 grams a foot is over 3 pounds a light.
Great video. Very interested in some details of the video – Why are Fluence SPYDRx PLUS on the bottom layer and Fluence VYPRx PLUS on the top layer of rolling-rack systems used for flowering stage? Why are Fluence SPYDRx PLUS and Fluence RAZRx used in vegetative?
Can either model be used for both?